The patch appears to be missing a number of classes. HeaderGroup and HeaderParser in particular.

Mike

On Sunday, February 9, 2003, at 09:17 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11218>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11218

handle multivalue headers correctly





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-10 02:17 -------
I took the patch a bit farther to store the headers in both a map and a list.
The list is order preserving, as with Mike's patch, but the map gives nice
access to the elements as was the original. The map entries are lists
themselves, lists of headers with all the same name which is used as the
lowercase key.

This might be a bit overboard, but its a best of both worlds approach. Uses a
bit more memory for the hashtable and lists, but there are no copies made of the
headers themsleves so all the datastructures just contain pointers. The most
complex code is in the remove methods.

Do you think that this is too out there?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to