> -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Bowler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 8:41 AM > To: Commons HttpClient Project > Subject: Re: release process for alpha3 > > > Ryan Hoegg wrote: > > The reason is that I want to support people who already have the > > httpclient library, but also streamline adoption by people > who don't. > > That means making a jar available that they can download, > drop in the > > classpath, and forget about. I am currently leaning > towards pointing > > users to the HttpClient download page instead of including > a binary-only > > release on our page. > > Is there a reason you can't just point them to the binary > only release > that's in the maven repository? > > http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/commons-httpclient/jars/
What about the fact that they won't have a copy of the license? That seems pretty important to me... -- Martin Cooper > > > -- > Mike Bowler > Principal, Gargoyle Software Inc. > Voice: (416) 822-0973 | Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Fax : (416) 822-0975 | Website: http://www.GargoyleSoftware.com > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
