Mike
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
Mike May I add your comments to the bug report? Oleg
On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 19:01, Mike Moran wrote:
Michael Becke wrote:
Agreed. A second thread should not be needed though. It can be done using something like:
[ ... ]
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
[ ... ]
I just wanted to butt into this to point out that on some platforms, such as 2.2 linux, a thread equates to a process id, and you can quickly run out of them. In these cases, a busy wait is far preferable to a new Thread. Also firing off a Thread when things are slow can cause sudden spikes in Thread use. I've recently seen an analogous problem with an older version of jboss when doing RMI connections which was a pain in the arse to work around.Oleg
On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 15:36, Ortwin Gl�ck wrote:
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
Odi, are you sure you want to have an extra thread per HttpMethod? I do
not think so
Oleg
Better than a busy wait, isn't it?
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
