I guess so. I believe the main objection of Eric was about release 3.0 plans not having been clearly articulated. That concern can (and should be addressed) with a separate document.
I am +1 for 2.0 branch. May the hacking toward 2.1 finally begin. Cheers Oleg -----Original Message----- From: Michael Becke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 00:54 To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] 2.1 release plan I think this is a good list for 2.1. As always I am sure more will come up, but I these are good goals. So, do we want to make this official and branch out 2.0? Mike On Monday, June 30, 2003, at 09:48 AM, Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote: > All, > I have taken the liberty of compiling a draft 2.1 release plan that > incorporates various ideas tossed around recently (special thanks go > to Eric Johnson). I feel we ought to clearly articulate our short- to > mid-term development plans before 2.0 goes RC1. > > Comments, ideas, critique welcome > > Cheers > > Oleg > > > > <RELEASE_PLAN_2_1.txt>------------------------------------------------- > -------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
