> BTW: I don't mind bugs, in any complex software there will be bugs, but I
> feel it is only "polite" to have (1) test projects on gump -- that run your
> unit tests [so I can 'depend upon them'] (2) transition projects on gump
> when you are doing a big re-work, so you control when folks get exposed to
> the new work. Folks like VFS just don't tinker w/ their code  that often,
> and so if this had been (or is) something inside their usage it could fester
> for a while. Since you chose to move them to CVS HEAD (for Gump) and since
> they don't run their unit tests (either) then my projects fail in Gump.

Adam, with all due respect let me point out that we have stable HTTPCLIENT_2_0_BRANCH 
branch that should be used by those who need API and/or code stability. If GUMP cannot 
be configured to use any other CVS branch but HEAD, this is a totally different kind 
of a problem, and it should be brought up to GUMP folks, not to us.

Oleg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to