> BTW: I don't mind bugs, in any complex software there will be bugs, but I > feel it is only "polite" to have (1) test projects on gump -- that run your > unit tests [so I can 'depend upon them'] (2) transition projects on gump > when you are doing a big re-work, so you control when folks get exposed to > the new work. Folks like VFS just don't tinker w/ their code that often, > and so if this had been (or is) something inside their usage it could fester > for a while. Since you chose to move them to CVS HEAD (for Gump) and since > they don't run their unit tests (either) then my projects fail in Gump.
Adam, with all due respect let me point out that we have stable HTTPCLIENT_2_0_BRANCH branch that should be used by those who need API and/or code stability. If GUMP cannot be configured to use any other CVS branch but HEAD, this is a totally different kind of a problem, and it should be brought up to GUMP folks, not to us. Oleg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
