Now that it's been a few weeks since RC2 I'm leaning towards a 2.0 final instead of a fixed RC2 release. How do the other committers feel about this?
Mike
On Oct 30, 2003, at 3:12 AM, Ortwin Glück wrote:
Personally I think one should not replace a release with a new version without changing its name. This causes confusion. So at least call it RC2-build2 or something like that.
To ensure this does not happen again in the future, should we include a check in the build.xml for the JavaC version used?
Odi
Michael Becke wrote:Assuming this new build fixes the problem, what is everyones' opinion about how we should proceed? As I see it we have the following options:
- replace the existing 2.0 RC2 distributions with the new ones and add a note about the change to the HttpClient site
- create a new release 2.0 RC3 and proceed with the normal release process
- do nothing. leave the unofficial build in my directory for the time being and wait for 2.0 final.
What does everyone think?
Mike
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
