DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25529>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25529 Redesign of HTTP authentication framework ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-12 13:52 ------- > The question is if the patch is step forward > or backward. I think the code is moving towards the right places. It's certainly an improvement. Good work so far. > Unless we are talking about different things, I believe that this is in fact the > case. There's _always_ (preemptive auth scheme notwithstanding) only one > instance of authentication scheme within a complete authentication cycle. Oh. So I have to look at it again. Then this is fine with me and I can try and make DigestAuth behave better ,-) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
