I think it would be unfair/surprising for clients to discover that they would have to do a legal an unexpected legal review just for the sake of eliminating a few bugs. In the case of my company, that would probably keep us using 2.0rc3 for a few extra releases.
Then again, I'll have to check with legal....
On the other hand, given the small bandwidth for developers here, perhaps it is just better to make the change, rather than messing around with the PMC.
-Eric.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26382>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26382
Update license terms
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-03 03:00 -------
I'm wondering if we should change licenses in mid release. I do not know if 2.0 causes any problems for users, but it seems like a pretty big change for this release. Perhaps we can wait until after 2.0 is released. How does everyone feel about this?
Mike
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
