> We can certainly rename it to just 2.0 +1 from me Oleg
-----Original Message----- From: Adrian Sutton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 04:45 To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release of Commons HttpClient 2.0 Final On 17/2/04 1:14 PM, "Michael Becke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Vincent, > > Thanks for adding the jar to ibiblio. I added the jar to > '/www/www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/commons-httpclient/' and > thought this was supposed to replicate with ibiblio. Perhaps this is > not working correctly. > > There's no real reason it's called 2.0 final I guess. This was just > the value I chose. We can certainly rename it to just 2.0. What does > everyone think? > > Mike 2.0 is a lot more predictable so I'd change to that instead. We postfix all our development versions anyway so it's clear that it's the final version by the lack of a postfix. BTW, great work to all involved in the release! It's nice to finally have it out the door. Regards, Adrian Sutton. ---------------------------------------------- Intencha "tomorrow's technology today" Ph: 38478913 0422236329 Suite 8/29 Oatland Crescent Holland Park West 4121 Australia QLD www.intencha.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
