None from me. I should have removed them when upgrading to ALv2 Oleg
On Sun, 2004-04-18 at 20:00, Jandalf wrote: > There are some minor license inconsistancies with the license use in the > .java files. In particular, there is a line of broilerplate that is not > intended to be literal: > > * [Additional notices, if required by prior licensing conditions] > > If there were actual additional notices, then they would go in that > place. AFAIK, there are no additional notices required for anything > HttpClient. I'l like to whosale remove that unnecessary line in all > files where it occurs (some correctly don't have it). I'll also update > the license.regexp file to be the correct broilerplate pattern so that > checkstyle runs clean on the java source file licenses and headers. > > Any objections? > > -jsd > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
