On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 11:41, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > Gabor (I hope I got your name right)
yes :) > *.util.HttpURLConnection was only meant to be a compatibility wrapper, > not a complete replacement which could be registered with JRE as a > full-blown URL handler. It is half-baked and is probably not very > functional. The general sentiment is that HttpURLConnection framework is > so broken that it is hardly worth the trouble. Anyways, we'll happily > accept a better HttpClient based HttpURLConnection implementation ;-) well...it's not a big deal if it's not complete.... we simply have some part of our program which use the standard-java http objects...so the other option would be to port that code to use httpclient....i'm still not sure which option is better/simpler...i'll have to look into the sources more gabor --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
