Hi Andrea,

If you require a patch against the 2.0 branch, take a look at the first example patch 
listed on the bug page.  We have been using that patch in LimeWire for quite a while 
and it has worked very well.  It is based off 2.0rc2, so it may require some changes 
to work with 2.0 final.

Thanks,
 Sam

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrea Fabris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 7:17 AM
To: Commons HttpClient Project
Subject: Re: MultiThreadedConnectionManager based on commons pool


Thanks, Oleg.
I've just downloaded the 3.0 latest build, and i'll take a look at it 
and how it solves the idle connection problem.

Right now, i need a way to use multithread with httpclient 2.0 (that is 
stable), so i think i'll use the code i've sent (because, as you said, 
the patch was applied to the 3.0 branch)

However, i see that it is very important to follow the EJB spec so 
httpclient could be used in an EJB container (that is, my solution is 
not compatible with EJB spec).
I would like to ask you something about it: are there some other points 
(other than http pooling) where httpclient has to be rewritten to be 
compatible with EJB spec?

Regards
Andrea

On 07/05/2004 12.53, Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote:
> Andrea,
> 
> Both 2.0 & CVS HEAD nightlies are available 
> <http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/httpclient/downloads.html>.
> 
> 
> This may sound a bit harsh, but I _personally_ do not see 2.0 API worthwhile of any 
> further development. As useful as it is HttpClient 2.0 API is fundamentally flawed 
> in many ways. HttpClient 3.0 will resolve many of the known problems 
> <http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-commons/httpclient/release_notes.txt?rev=1.21&view=markup>
>  and will render 2.0 completely obsolete. Again, this is just my personal (humble) 
> opinion. As long as there's substantial interest in HttpClient 2.0, it will be 
> supported.. However, I do think all new development should take place in CVS HEAD.
> 
> Oleg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to