Sam, That would be a much appreciated contribution. We already have a bunch of base TestCase classes that encapsulate shared commonalities for different type of test cases. However, BaseBaseTestCase can still be a great idea (apart from the name ;-)
Oleg On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 18:45, Sam Berlin wrote: > Sure thing. Speaking of JUnit tests -- how do you all feel about a > class above 'TestCase' that adds more types of assertX methods? For > our LimeWire tests, we have an AssertComparison class that adds a bunch > of utility methods (so that we can see the expected/actual values > easier). We don't have a javadoc built (we don't build them for the > tests package), but the class, if you want to glance at it, is at: > http://tests.limewire.org/source/browse/tests/com/limegroup/gnutella/ > util/AssertComparisons.java?rev=1.10&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup > . It adds assertEquals methods for arrays of native types & objects, > assertContains for collections, assertInstanceof and > assertNotInstanceof, assertNotEquals, assertGreaterThan, > assertLessThan, assertGreaterThanOrEquals, assertLessThanOrEquals, > etc... We also have a class above that one called 'BaseTestCase' that > adds a fail(Throwable, String) method so we can fail with an > informative message and the error. If you're really looking for the > full experience, we also use a LimeTestSuite class that extends > TestSuite and adds nice features to the tests package, calling a static > 'globalSetUp' and 'globalTearDown' before/after the first/last test is > run in each suite, if there's static things that need to be set up & > torn down once for the whole suite. BaseTestCase also adds some > features that set up certain directory structures and settings before > each test, and kills leftover files after the test is finished. > > Thanks, > Sam > > On Tuesday, May 18, 2004, at 03:45 AM, Ortwin Glück wrote: > > > Sam Berlin wrote: > >> I'm not sure if this problem is still on CVS HEAD, but we're seeing > >> it against 2.0rc2. > > > > Sam, > > > > would you mind writing a JUnit test case exhibiting the problem > > against CVS HEAD? Thanks. > > > > Ortwin Glück > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
