DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29383>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29383 MultiThreadedConnectionManager Accounting Problems ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-08 12:43 ------- Mike, I remember that. I am not questioning the rationale of stale check. The question is if there's any good reason for isOpen to call isStale? Roland, I see one problem with this approach. In HTTP there's no such thing as OPEN_FOR_SURE. A perfectly valid connection at the time of getStatus call may go stale by the time HttpClient is actually ready to do the writing on that connection Oleg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
