Zulfi,

If you expect us to react on this report, you have to be a little more specific on how 
exactly you measured the performance, exactly what kind of HTTP methods your tests 
included, exactly what pre-release-candidate you are referring to, and what exactly 
you mean by "but it is still slower than using JDK-1.4.2". Do you actually mean using 
HttpURLConnection? Raw socket? Something else?

I'll run a few tests of my own to see if I get significant difference in terms of 
performance between HttpClient 2.0alpha3, 2.0.1, CVS HEAD (post-3.0a1) and 
HttpURLConnection

Oleg


-----Original Message-----
From: Zulfi Umrani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 7:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HttpClient performance


Hi,

Just wanted to get the latest information on the performance issues
reported earlier. I have gone through the below emails from Archive, but
could not get a definite solution to the performance problem. Wondering
whether a definite solution was found and whether there is a patch
available. We tested the performance using pre-release-candidate version
of HttpClient(2.0) and it was much better than the release-candidate
versions and the final 2.0 version of HttpClient. Please note that I did
try using the  SimpleHttpConnectionManager and calling the
setConnectionStaleCheckingEnabled method with false argument. The
performance does improve, but it is still slower than using JDK-1.4.2. I
will appreciate if someone who knows the solution can respond.
   

http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgId=781750
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgId=781859
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgId=781909
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgId=779703

Thanks.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


***************************************************************************************************
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.  Access 
to this email by anyone other than the intended addressee is unauthorized.  If you are 
not the intended recipient of this message, any review, disclosure, copying, 
distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it 
is prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you are not the intended recipient, please 
reply to or forward a copy of this message to the sender and delete the message, any 
attachments, and any copies thereof from your system.
***************************************************************************************************

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to