On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 3:44 PM, geni <[email protected]> wrote: > For businesses they seem > to prefer paid for images under terms that are fairly agreed. ... > A free content license is not what makes wikipedia popular and it will > not be what makes commons popular. > > -- > geni
I think this is an excellent point. Something that might make Commons more attractive to contributors as well as potential users: structuring the upload system, templates and page layouts to make it easy to contact contributors (if they wish) to work out licensing terms, or even faciltate some sort of for-pay rights system directly. Of course, a free license would remain a requirement, but many print publications are unwilling either to trust purportedly free content or to abide by copyleft terms. If Commons made it easier to do traditional stock photography-type transactions, this might be a great benefit to other Wikimedia projects as well as to Commons on its own terms. -Sage (User:Ragesoss) _______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
