ps. Michael deserves big thanks for his great work on this :-) On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Michael Maggs <[email protected]> wrote:
> Users' views on the need for subject-consent for photographs of > identifiable people vary hugely, from "why should we need consent > anyway?" to "any photo that has no subject consent is obviously illegal > and msut be deleted". This divergence of views is causing uncertainty > and inconsistent keep/delete decisions on Deletion Requests. The > uncertainty is harming not also Commons but also its Wiki "customers". > > I have made a proposal with a view to obtaining consensus for a middle > ground, at > > > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Photographs_of_identifiable_people/Proposal > > More comments are needed on the talk page, especially - if I may be > permitted to canvass mildy - from users who have views that are not at > one end or the other of the spectrum. Please don't just leave the > discussion to those with very strong views. > > Michael > > > _______________________________________________ > Commons-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l >
_______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
