2009/6/19 Daniel Schwen <[email protected]> > > I posted into a Commons user sandbox: User:Alex brollo/O_Categories a > more > > detailed talk about novel use of self-transcluding categories. . I'd like > > Ok, how is that not pretty much exactly the same as atomic/tag-like > categorization? > > Yeah yeah , i get it you propose to have the user add categories in a > subst- > template like fashion, but that is just a "convenience", the end-result is > atomic categorization. > > Uhm... ...I'm all for it :-). And as we all know built in category > intersection is (just like Duke Nukem Forever and Nuclear Fusion) juuuuust > about to happen ;-)
Thanks Daniel for your interest. As usual, I have a strange "do-it-yoursef" approach to this kind of difficult topics. So I can't guess if/where/how this kind of topic has been discussed (I saw lots of discussions on categorization, many of them so much exoteric than I can't undestand them; nor I'm interested into extensions development, I have much fun using existing, basic tools) . Nevertheless, in my tryes, such e trick turned out very simple to use, you can add and remove "axes", "branches" and "leaves" and to convert a "leaf" (i.e. a "terminal category") into a "branch"... a couple of more interested comments, and I'll implement just some of such "catwords" into Commons, just to let you see how they precisely work. Alex
_______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
