2009/9/13 John Vandenberg <[email protected]>: > On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Gerard Meijssen > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The archive of Cologne was a state of the art archive in Germany. If >> anything it was the kind of institution that people would donate collections >> to because of its excellent reputation and practices. A similar story >> happened to an archive in Theresienstadt if I remember well. Cologne >> collapsed because of an accident with an underground that was dug, >> Theresienstadt saw its collection disappear in flames. >> We are not an archive. But our best efforts help safeguard against the total >> loss of an archive. We can be complementary to what our partners do. We >> should not think so insular. > If they do not have proper archival practices (i.e. redundancy/tape > backup), we should tell them about Internet Archive. > It is insular to think we need to be the solution for problems we are > not well prepared to solve. No indeed. However, it certainly doesn't hurt and archival copies of this stuff is certainly within our remit. (Though the Internet Archive are freer on what licenses they accept and will gleefully accept archives of just about anything.) - d. _______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
