On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:57 PM, David Monniaux <[email protected]> wrote:
> Of special relevance to us is this section of the report:
>
> Second recommendation
>
> Lift the obstacles to the presence of French data on collaborative sites
>
> Context
>
> The Internet has changed because of the development of a multitude of
> personal sites, as well as a new generation of platforms and services
> whose content is provided by “communities”, some of which have become
> powerful international industries. Thus, the sites Wikipedia around the
> world welcome a total of 240 million unique visitors a month and the
> site in French 10 million unique visitors a month. The articles on these
> sites on topics related to France are currently illustrated by amateur
> photographs, or photographs from foreign collections.
>
> Arguments
>
> When an encyclopedic site such as Wikipedia needs photographs of
> Egyptian antiquities in order to get illustrations for its articles, it
> calls a museum. For the Louvre, accepting to donate its photographs
> would significantly augment their exposure to the world and, thus, the
> visibility of the museum as opposed to, say, the British Museum or the
> Cairo Museum. All the more, the presentation of paintings or drawings of
> Ingres on a site with such a high number of visitors would be positive
> for the museum of Montauban.
>
> The presence of public cultural data on community-run platforms would
> augment their visibility and that of the public organizations that
> provided them, both nationally and internationally.
>
> Nevertheless, some legal obstacles currently hinder agreements with
> these platforms. Indeed, because these sites are mostly constituted of
> texts written and posted by private individuals, they propose so-called
> “free” licenses which are in certain respects incompatible with current
> French intellectual property law : no royalties for right holders,
> indefinite rights of reuse, incompatibility with certain moral rights.
> Therefore, a common ground should be reached so that these legal
> difficulties are not insurmontable.
>
> Conditions for fulfilling this recommendation
>
> Elaborate and implement a specific reflection that would take into
> account the forces of the parties, the potential gains for visibility of
> the data and public cultural institutions, and the legal obstacles of
> the exposition of our public data on collaborative sites. Such an
> agreement would evidently include restrictions on the resolution of
> photographs or videos put online and the obligation to create links,
> which could maximize the flow of visits and income to the donating
> institutions and the distribution pole considered (RMN, INA, etc.).
>
> [Note of translator: the report suggests centralizing the currently
> dispersed system for licensing of public works on a few number of poles,
> such as the Reunion of national museums (RMN; museum photographs) and
> the National audiovisual institute (television archives).]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Commons-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
>


Great news, David. Just so I'm sure I understand, the above is the
official report to the Culture Minister that he adopted? And the
report mentions Wikipedia twice in the second section? If so, awesome
work.

Nathan

_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l

Reply via email to