2009/10/25 Daniel Kinzler <[email protected]>

>
> This is a matter of much debate and disagreement, as old as copyleft
> licenses.
> It's "strong" or "viral" copyleft vs. "weak" or "soft" copyleft.
> Traditionally,
> the FSF takes teh side of strong copyleft with the GFDL, and the CC crowd
> tends
> more towards the weak variant, implying that the share-alike requirement
> does
> not apply to "aggregate" works, only "true" derivatives. To me, that makes
> more
> sense in practice, even though it may be less desierable in principle. The
> distinction is tricky, however.
>

I can't force anyone, but I'll post my own contributions as PD, if allowed,
and I encourage other to post their contributions as PD too, if they like.

Alex
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l

Reply via email to