But. there's no reason why the two should be technically separated. It's already been practically divided by categories. It's not considered unnecessary faff just by techs; any pragmatic person would agree.
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:03 PM, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: > On 1 February 2011 23:41, Gnangarra <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Why would these images even need a wiki, these images are the property of > > the foundation if they are such a big concern to Commons Community, (I've > > been on common for a few years and was not aware of real concerns about > > those images) then the Foundation should address the issue. > > > There have been slight concerns over the years, with a small number of > people greatly concerned that Commons carries non-free WMF utility > images as well as the free media. > > This is a reasonable viewpoint to hold. But no, I agree with you - > mostly people aren't that worried. > > I note only that technically it would be feasible, the idea would just > be considered unnecessary faff by most of the people who'd be involved > in actually doing the work. > > > - d. > > _______________________________________________ > Commons-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l >
_______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
