On 23 February 2011 02:49, Gnangarra <[email protected]> wrote: > The wording of templates has been distilled down to the simplist cleanest > coldest plainest language possible to facilitate multilingual nature of > Commons and that comes across as being agressive and unfriendly.
And it still comes as robotic and preremptory. Utter failure with the best of intentions is still utter failure. Improving a wrong approach to perfection does not make it work. No, I don't have a ready alternative. That doesn't make a failure a success either. - d. _______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
