On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Daniel Schwen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I asked on this list a few years about negative scanning. The topic's >>> come up again at http://saveaussiemusic.org/ , so I wrote this up: > > I have quite a bunch of slides myself. And I was wondering how the > slide scanners stack up against photographing a projected slide. Dark > room, high quality screen, camera on a tripod, manual white balance, > exposure bracketing. This should give decent results with a good SLR. > Unfortunately I don't have my slides accessible right now. > Of course a dedicated scanner might offer a more streamlined workflow. > Then again with a wire remote there are only two buttons to press per > slide, camera and projector advance. The post processing could be > pretty much automated (the static subject should make assembly of > bracketed exposures trivial. > The upside would be a probably much better reproduction of the slides' > dynamic range. > Any experiences here?
I have an old Relfecta scanner for films and slides. Example: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:World%27s_lowest_point_(1971).jpg (no noise/scratch/etc filters applied) Cheers, Magnus _______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
