I doubt that our licenses and Google's license filter are playing together well.
I am regularly pinged by a Google guy who is desperate to get Commons data into Google Image Search in a more systematic way. If any of you think this project is interesting I can totally get you off the ground. It will not be hard. On 10/13/11 12:24 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote: > Magnus Manske, 13/10/2011 14:18: >> http://www.dailyblogtips.com/how-to-find-free-pictures-for-your-blog/ > > So basically, it lists 3 search engines and two obscure websites whose > images you have to pay (one of them with only 400k images)? > Perhaps it's only an advertisement for those websites. > >> Guess which site with lots of free images is not mentioned...? >> >> We /seriously/ need to do more PR (viral or otherwise) for Commons! > > Sure. But it would be enough if people used Google with a license > filter. Problem is, many seem to prefer all rights reserved images > (including this blog post), or they don't care. > > Nemo > > _______________________________________________ > Commons-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l -- Neil Kandalgaonkar (| <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
