I do believe that Adam's work is enough for him to have some credit for it. If any of us edit an image, we do receive the credit (there is even a template for it: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Retouched_picture ). So, why so much trouble to credit him? Can't we do like we do with multiple licensed pictures (for example: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Redwikiheart-10,8M-heartonly.png )? _____ *Béria Lima*
*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. Ajude-nos a construir esse sonho. <http://wikimedia.pt/Donativos>* On 9 July 2012 10:46, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: > On 9 July 2012 14:42, Thomas Morton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Regardless; why are we being such dicks? As diametrically opposed to > > copyright as some of us are, it genuinely doesn't hurt anyone for those > > works to be tagged CC-BY-SA. They can still be reused widely, Adam gets > > credit for his hard work, and everyone is happy. > > > Someone proposed such a tag on Commons for the NPG images (PD in US, > CC-by or whatever elsewhere), and supporters happened to include me > and DCoetzee, but quite a lot of people strenuously objected. (I don't > have a link to hand.) But I'm sure Adam's diplomatic skills will > convince people the proposal should be resurrected. > > > - d. > > _______________________________________________ > Commons-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l >
_______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
