So, any suggestions? -- とある白い猫 (To Aru Shiroi Neko)
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:34 PM, とある白い猫 <[email protected]>wrote: > So perhaps a new sub category for pages that will handle legal issues that > need clarification? Ten issues were mentioned so far and each could have > their own page explaining steps taken or planned to be taken as well as > other relevant information and links. > > While my interest is on the copyright of DSOs by no means it is confided > to it. :) > > -- とある白い猫 (To Aru Shiroi Neko) > > > On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> Samuel Klein, 22/09/2012 19:25: >> >> True. It would be good to have a community platform describing what >>> should be PD and what clarifications are needed in which current laws to >>> clarify the matter. >>> >> >> As for PD, Communia's websites could perhaps be expanded in that way, it >> could be a partnership to propose them? >> See >> http://publicdomainday.org/**node/5<http://publicdomainday.org/node/5>for a >> resource list. >> >> >> Starting with relatively easy ones such as this, >>> digitized versions of the law, &c. >>> That would make it easy to both unify public support behind a specific >>> idea, and to offer next steps to politicians or lawyers who decide to >>> get involved in making them happen. And it would help the WMF, >>> chapters, and other large movement groups to run a campaign for a >>> specific change if that is called for. >>> >> >> This is surely something Meta can be used for, but it's probably not that >> good a platform. But I'm not good at planning political campaigns like this. >> >> >> Right now there is no permanent collection of these sorts of positions; >>> the thread on Commons VP is simply archived. And there are dozens of >>> other conversations that lead to useful human-readable syntheses of the >>> current state of international copyright law, which aren't quite >>> gathered together in one place. Compiling these discussions and >>> approaches into a single forum for copyright issues would also be a >>> general service to everyone who cares about the copyfight. >>> >> >> Factual documentation should not necessarily be all centralised. Commons >> and Wikisource complement each other quite well, I found; on the other hand >> (English) Wikipedia's project pages are mostly confusing duplicate content >> and should mostly be moved elsewhere. >> >> >> On Meta perhaps? Currently there are separate discussions on commons, >>> wikisources, and wikipedias. >>> http://meta.wikimedia.org/**wiki/Category:Copyright<http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Copyright> >>> is quite sparse. >>> >> >> The category and its parent need some categorization effort (I did some >> but not everything), there's much more stuff around although not as much as >> one could want. >> >> Nemo >> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Commons-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/commons-l<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l> >> > >
_______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
