On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) <[email protected]>wrote:
> Matthew Roth, 23/05/2013 17:31: > >> So, what's the future of CC on Flickr? >> >> http://www.flickr.com/__**creativecommons/<http://www.flickr.com/__creativecommons/> >> >> >> <http://www.flickr.com/**creativecommons/<http://www.flickr.com/creativecommons/>> >> shows only 260M CC images: >> there were already 220M in 2011 if I read news correctly; only 60M >> are free. 75 % of the times I ask a user to put an image under >> cc-by-sa they choose -nc-nd because "it was the first option" (and >> some of course "what, isn't Wikipedia non-commercial?!). >> Is this the price to pay to Instagram, Tumblr and Facebook? >> >> >> There are already lots of problems with Facebook (and various other >> social networks) and free licenses. See this analysis here: >> http://meta.wikimedia.org/**wiki/Legal_and_Community_** >> Advocacy/CC-BY-SA_on_Facebook<http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Legal_and_Community_Advocacy/CC-BY-SA_on_Facebook> >> > > Yes but there's a difference between that and forcing good sources of free > knowledge like Flickr to drop this aspect agreed :) > , which Facebook never had. :) (If this is what's happening.) > Ah, of course they also removed the option to have unlimited uploads: only > current pro users can keep it, for the others there are only expensive > storage plans. > > Nemo > -- Matthew Roth Global Communications Manager Wikimedia Foundation +1.415.839.6885 ext 6635 www.wikimediafoundation.org *http://blog.wikimedia.org/*
_______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
