Is there some kind of CSS tag I can use to mark a caption as hidden on visual 
browsers but visible on screen readers?  

My experience with A/B testing is that visible captions badly hurt the 
viability of any commercial image site.  Layouts that break up the physical 
flow of the images seem to make many people feel mentally,  physically or 
emotionally uncomfortable.  (Most just leave)  This is why even Flickr has 
changed to a hidden caption format.

I,  for one,  liked the old Flickr better because it was faster,  for one thing.

Wikipedia Commons is an 800 pound gorilla,  not all the start-ups and 
conglomerates that are equally desperate to seduce the marginal user away from 
their competitors.  We can do something different.


From: Gnangarra 
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 10:31 PM
To: [email protected] ; Wikimedia Commons Discussion List 
Cc: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [Commons-l] Redesigning the <gallery> tag.

Requiring a hoover to see a caption becomes an impediment to non sight readers 
who rely on various readers.
This format is used on sites like Flickr, Pininterest, Google+ etc.. while many 
user spend there time just scraping these sites do we really need to look them
How does an editor decide what image sizes are, 

IMHO rather than doing this to <gallery> tag something thats frowned upon in 
GA, A class and FA processes on en.WP anyway this would be better utilised 
within the category structure where the more important elements of image size, 
and name could be displayed with the hover giving you linking options.


On 11 June 2013 10:20, bawolff <[email protected]> wrote:

  That's how its currently implemented (with an attribute named mode). How it 
all works (Or even if it gets adopted), will depend on the sort of feedback I 
get.

  You're 100% right, that this would not work well with the COM:QIC workflow, 
and there are many places where the captions are important. But I would argue 
there are many places where people just have captions as a place holder text 
since there is a spot for a caption (Many [not all] galleries on commons fit 
this description). In particular, the captions on the auto-generated galleries 
in category listings are pretty useless, and could easily be replaced with 
something triggered on hover.

  Even in encyclopedic contexts, a gallery is used as a collection of pretty 
pictures, and the caption is a sort of "see also" text to provide further 
context for if one of the images catches the reader's eye.

  --bawolff

  On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Daniel Schwen <[email protected]> wrote:

    If this should find its way into core, it should be made optional
    (using an attribute of <gallery>)! Please be aware that this would
    instantly destroy gallery applications like COM:QIC. Also from a
    usability standpoint hiding the captions is probably not always a good
    thing. Especially in the context of an encyclopedia rather than a
    "pretty picture" site (like flickr).
    Daniel


    On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 6:36 PM, bawolff <mailto:bawolff%[email protected]> 
wrote:
    > [Cross posting to commons-l and design list]
    >
    > Hi all,
    >
    > Over the last couple days, I've been looking at making our <gallery> tag a
    > lot more slick. Compared to other websites, our galleries look very "boxy"
    > imo. This isn't that bad when it comes to icon/clip art type media, but 
for
    > photos I feel we could really do better. So I've tried to make the 
galleries
    > be more compact, with rows of images all the same height but different
    > width, and the caption visible on hover. The only downside to this is the
    > borders of the gallery become a little ragged, which mostly looks fine to 
me
    > (Possibly could be dealt with with js. Would involve a bit of double 
loading
    > the images though).
    >
    > A demo speaks louder than words, hence:
    >
    > *
    > 
http://tools.wmflabs.org/bawolff/gallery/index.php?title=Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media
    > (contrast with
    > 
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media
    > )
    > *
    > 
http://tools.wmflabs.org/bawolff/gallery/index.php?title=Featured_pictures/Animals/Fish
    > (contrast with
    > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Fish )
    > * http://tools.wmflabs.org/bawolff/gallery/index.php?title=Main_Page
    >
    > Additionally the wiki is open to editor (You need to register an account
    > first), so please don't hesitate to experiment.
    >
    > Anyhow, this is all still a work in progress, and I would really 
appreciate
    > your feedback/criticism/hate mail/love letters/etc.
    > --
    > Thanks,
    > Bawolff
    >

    > _______________________________________________
    > Commons-l mailing list
    > [email protected]
    > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
    >



  _______________________________________________
  Commons-l mailing list
  [email protected]
  https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l





-- 
GN.
Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
Gn. Blogg: http://gnangarra.wordpress.com 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l

Reply via email to