Hi all,

To echo Erik's comment, we are still in early planning stages for our 
multimedia goals this year.

We have been discussing ways for users to provide feedback about media files, 
but are currently leaning away from comments, which would require 
time-consuming moderation.

Our goal is to set up community discussions in the fall to discuss a range of 
curation or feedback options, such as a quick way for  users to tag files as 
useful or inappropriate -- or compare files with each other. 

Based on these discussions, we plan to recommend simple features which could be 
implemented in early 2014, if we can find practical solutions that work for 
most stakeholders.

We will keep you all posted on how these early plans evolve in coming weeks, 
and invite you to join our upcoming discussions. Keep in mind that we are still 
in the process of hiring a team for this multimedia initiative, which is likely 
to take a few more months, so our development efforts will remain limited until 
then.

For now, you can learn more about this project here:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Multimedia

More to come.

All the best,


Fabrice

_______________________________

Fabrice Florin
Product Manager, Multimedia
Wikimedia Foundation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fabrice_Florin_(WMF)

@fabriceflorin



On Aug 2, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Erik Moeller wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> FYI
>> <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Wikimedia_Engineering%2F2013-14_Goals&diff=753459&oldid=736806>
>> AFT is this: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Article_feedback
> 
> It's under consideration. Goals are iterated regularly and shouldn't
> be taken as a definitive roadmap; goals for later quarters are more
> likely to change.
> 
> -- 
> Erik Möller
> VP of Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Foundation
> 
> _______________________________________________

On Aug 2, 2013, at 11:03 AM, Andrew Gray wrote:

> This is linked (I am guessing) to an open RFC on Commons about such a
> tool, intended for opt-in use on specific collections (ie, those where
> we know there is a user or an external partner intending to do
> something with the responses)
> 
> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Requests_for_Comment/Feedback
> 
> - I set it up in March, it got a trickle of (positive) feedback but
> has not had any comments since May/June. Thoughts appreciated.
> 
> Andrew.
> 
> On 2 August 2013 17:25, Federico Leva (Nemo) <[email protected]> wrote:
>> FYI
>> <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Wikimedia_Engineering%2F2013-14_Goals&diff=753459&oldid=736806>
>> AFT is this: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Article_feedback
>> 
>> Nemo
> 

_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l

Reply via email to