Good news. I received an email back from Catherine Draycott who is the Head of 
Wellcome Images. She said that they were very much interested in uploading 
Wellcome's CC-BY images to the Commons, and suggested we talk on the phone. I 
was going to suggest that we:

a) get the project described at [1] 
b) coordinate work here on commons-l
c) talk to the GLAMToolset [2] folks who have been working with Europeana and 
other GLAM organizations to bulk upload images
d) think about how Wellcome's Wikipedia in Residence [3] could help facilitate 
the upload

Does that sound like a reasonable way to proceed? If anyone else would like to 
be on the call let me know. If there is a Commons veteran who has experience 
with bulk uploading and is willing to work with the Wellcome Trust in a 
constructive way I’m willing to just tag along on the call and let them take 
the reigns as it were.

//Ed

PS. Congratulations on the wedding Liam :-D

[1] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Batch_uploading
[2] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:GLAMToolset_project
[3] 
https://cancer-research-uk-jobs.tal.net/vx/appcentre-External/brand-2/candidate/so/pm/1/pl/4/opp/482-Wikipedian-in-Residence/en-GB

On Jan 21, 2014, at 6:43 PM, Liam Wyatt <[email protected]> wrote:

> I see this was also announced on the WM-UK blog - 
> http://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/2014/01/wellcome-images-freely-releases-100000-images/
>  
> I've copied in Jonathan who is the WMUK GLAM coordinator in case he's had any 
> involvement in Wellcome's announcement. Perhaps he can lend insight?
> 
> I've worked on quite a few image-release negotiations and it is possible that 
> this has been done this way through honest mistake, through justifed fears, 
> through meddling of the legal/marketing departments....  I quite like Andy 
> Mabbett's comment on Wellcome's blog announcement, sums up the problems 
> (legal and technological) quite well in my opinion: 
> 
> "It’s great to have these images available, digitally, but why are you 
> claiming copyright over, and to be the original source of, artworks and 
> images from books which are already in the public domain? Why have you added 
> a strapline underneath each image? And why is the precess of downloading high 
> resolution versions of these public-domain works so tortuous, with a CAPTCHA, 
> irrelevant terms & condition, and zipped files – why not make them available 
> directly?" - (comment no.3) 
> http://blog.wellcomelibrary.org/2014/01/thousands-of-years-of-visual-culture-made-free-through-wellcome-images/
>  
> I also agree with Andy's response here - to chose option 2b - take the images 
> that we can, label them as PD and *politely* explain (preferably in person) 
> why we do not legally recognise their CC-BY claim even though we WILL make 
> every effort to attribute properly. While we're at it, I would point Wellcome 
> to the Europeana PD charter 
> http://pro.europeana.eu/web/europeana-project/public-domain-charter-en 
> 
> -Liam 
> 
> 
> wittylama.com
> Peace, love & metadata
> 
> 
> On 22 January 2014 09:42, Andy Mabbett <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 21 January 2014 16:53, Magnus Manske <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > So, we have the following options:
> >
> > 1. Ignore them (pity)
> 
> Not going to happen; note work-in-progress, and discussion, at:
> 
>    
> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Batch_uploading/Wellcome_Images_CC-BY
> 
> > 2. Upload them as public domain and re-iterate the National Portrait Gallery
> > issue, and teach them that these open content wiki people are not to be
> > trusted
> 
> 2b politely explain to WT that their licence statement is in error,
> and why, and that even if people in the UK abide by it, it is
> unenforceable internationally.
> 
> > 3. Label them CC-BY so the Wellcome Trust can get a mandatory attribution,
> > which we would do anyway
> 
> No, for the reasons stated by Christoph, and in the Commons discussion
> cited above. And we would not advise re-users that the attribution is
> mandatory.
> 
> --
> Andy Mabbett
> @pigsonthewing
> http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GLAM mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GLAM mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam


_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l

Reply via email to