Similarly, last year, for the sake of comparing to the same time of the
year:
images (B) html (B) img:html ratio
2013-01 151.4 25.2 6
2013-02 150.7 25.8 5.8
2013-03 158.5 26.7 5.9
2013-04 156.2 26.2 5.9
2013-05 148.8 25.8 5.8
2013-06 144.1 25.3 5.7
2013-07 134.7 27.5 4.9
2013-08 130.4 34.1 3.8
2013-09 147 35.1 4.2
2013-10 151.6 38 4
2013-11 156.6 37.9 4.1
2013-12 143 26.7 5.4
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 12:48 AM, Gergo Tisza <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> If I'm reading this correctly:
>> *
>> <
>> https://web.archive.org/web/20140807205406/http://stats.wikimedia.org/wikimedia/squids/SquidReportRequests.htm
>> >
>> *
>> <
>> https://web.archive.org/web/20140719114013/http://stats.wikimedia.org/wikimedia/squids/SquidReportRequests.htm
>> >
>> there was a substantial drop in the total number of files served in July
>> compared to June, from 160 to 149 billions (last line of the first
>> table): proportionally bigger than the 25-24 fluctuation in HTML pages
>> served. Given the numbers, most of these must be thumbnails.
>> What does this mean?
>>
>
> Looking at the archive ( http://stats.wikimedia.org/archive/squid_reports/
> ):
>
> images (B) html (B) img:html ratio
> 2014-01 153 24.4 6.3
> 2014-02 163.4 24.5 6.7
> 2014-03 160 24.8 6.5
> 2014-04 150.2 25.7 5.8
> 2014-05 158.8 25.9 6.1
> 2014-06 160.4 25.2 6.4
> 2014-07 148.6 24 6.2
>
> so the numbers don't seem unusual.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Commons-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
>
>
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
