I don't see any issue extracting the images from the books. However I see a problem identifying an image when it is out of context. And the text of the books is certainly as much of interest as the images.
Regards, Yann 2014-08-31 1:01 GMT+05:30 David Goodman <[email protected]>: > The reason to have the images specifically is that the key part of their > project was the great difficulty in identifying and extracting the images > from the books. . . > > > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Yann Forget <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I think it would be better to have the whole books, rather than images >> out of context. >> >> Regards, >> >> Yann >> >> 2014-08-29 15:04 GMT+05:30 Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]>: >> > Hoi, >> > This article is of both interest to Commons and Wikipedia.. It is >> > awesome. >> > Thanks, >> > GerardM >> > >> > http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-28976849 >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Commons-l mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Commons-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l > > > > > -- > David Goodman > > DGG at the enWP > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DGG > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG > > _______________________________________________ > Commons-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l > _______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
