On 4 December 2014 at 09:08, James Heald <[email protected]> wrote: > As well as exact duplicates, there may often also be different versions of > the same painting with different lighting, or scans of slightly different > reproductions of the same work. I don't know whether the algorithm is > permissive enough to pick all of these up, but as many as can be picked up > would be good to tag as "other versions" of the same underlying image.
Careful here - algorithms that spot almost-duplicates will happily flag different shots from the same shoot. Definitely not something to act upon without close human inspection. > In general, we probably wouldn't *remove* duplicate images, but we would > want to identify them as versions of each other. Oh yeah, this'll be useful. - d. _______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
