You might wanna consider the recommended guidelines for here too: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Image_guidelines#Quality_and_featured_photographic_images
Although the guidelines apply to quality and featured images, I think the underlying reasons check. At least, a 2MP resolution can be considered the minimum. I don't know if any image below that threshold will look good enough these days on screens. rex On Sunday, May 21, 2017, Flor Méchain <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello! > > I am in touch with a museum that is thinking of uploading images to > Commons. They are a bit uncertain about uploading high resolution, but I > told them the resolution they need to upload just needs to be good enough > for illustrating articles without being pixellated. The thing is, I am > unsure about the minimum size of such an image. I tried poking around the > instructions but didn't find a direct answer. > > Do you know which size is "the minimum" that can be accepted on Commons? > > Thanks a lot for your help! > > Warm wishes, > > -- > Flor MECHAIN > Wikimedia CH > E: [email protected] > M: +41 78 746 86 25 > W: Flor WMCH > > Wikimedia CH is a swiss non profit organisation which supports Wikipedia, > the free online encyclopedia > > > _______________________________________________ > Commons-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l >
_______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
