I always understood that custom templates should be avoided, if necessary. However, what I would need at the least are the following items:
Auteur van de tekst (indien van toepassing, bv. Bij Augustinus Confessiones) *Author* Kopiist (indien bekend) *Copiist* Kunstenaar – verluchter indien bekend, dit staat als het goed is bij ‘annotatie’ *Artist* Datering – Jaar *Date* Titel – titel van het hele manuscript – Titel (dit is dus primair de titel van de tekst, bv. Confessiones, maar kan ook de titel zijn van het soort boek: Getijdenboek) *Title* Beschrijving – handschrift en folium, iconografische beschrijving afbeelding *Description* Techniek/materiaal – illustraties op perkament *Medium* Afmetingen – Afmetingen *Dimensions* Locatie – Universiteitsbibliotheek Utrecht *Location* Inventarisnr. – nr. + volledige beschrijving van het handschrift en digitale versie: url *Accession number* Plaats van vervaardiging (indien bekend) *Place of creation* Herkomst – provenantie, indien van toepassing, bv. Mariakek *Place of discovery* Bron/fotograaf – Is dat UB Utrecht? Misschien kan er een banner worden gemaakt, net als bij de KB. *Source* Toestemming – open licentie, commons *Permission* So if I actually look at it, the only thing what is really different from the artwork template is that there needs to be room for 3 different creator roles (Author, Copiist, Artist). Arne Wossink Projectleider / Project Manager Wikimedia Nederland *(Werkdagen: maandag, dinsdag, donderdag / Office hours: Monday, Tuesday, Thursday)* Tel. +31 (0)6 11000505 E-mail: [email protected] *Postadres*: * Bezoekadres:* Postbus 167 Mariaplaats 3 3500 AD Utrecht Utrecht 2017-06-15 15:02 GMT+02:00 Tuszynski, Jarek W. < [email protected]>: > > > Arme, > > > > A standard approach is to create custom template for you uploads which is > based on one of existing templates. See for example > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Infobox_ > templates:_based_on_Artwork_template or https://commons.wikimedia.org/ > wiki/Category:Infobox_templates:_based_on_Photograph_template . If you > need help I can help with creating one for you. > > > > Jarek T. > > (user:Jarekt) > > > > *From:* Commons-l [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Arne Wossink > *Sent:* Thursday, June 15, 2017 8:57 AM > *To:* [email protected]; Wikimedia & GLAM collaboration > [Public]; Wikimedia Chapters cultural partners coordination - closed list > *Subject:* EXTERNAL: [Commons-l] Metadata of digitized manuscripts > > > > Hey all, > > > > I'm helping out with an upload of digitized manuscripts. We were > discussing the metadata that come with those, and there were some issues > that weren't covered by any of the existing useful templates (book or > artwork). However, I would still prefer to use an existing template instead > of building something from different fields. Does anyone have experience > with uploading manuscripts and associated metadata to Commons, and can > point me to some examples of how specific problems were solved? > > > > Best, > > > > Arne Wossink > > > > Projectleider / Project Manager Wikimedia Nederland > > > > *(Werkdagen: maandag, dinsdag, donderdag / Office hours: Monday, Tuesday, > Thursday)* > > > > Tel. +31 (0)6 11000505 <+31%206%2011000505> > > E-mail: [email protected] > > > > *Postadres*: > * Bezoekadres:* > > Postbus 167 Mariaplaats 3 > > 3500 AD Utrecht Utrecht > > _______________________________________________ > Commons-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l > >
_______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
