Folks are terrible at agreeing what "significant" means, including some
immovable admins who regularly read it as "any".

Go for it.

Fae
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/LGBT+
http://telegram.me/wmlgbt

On 30 Jul 2017 04:08, "Gnangarra" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I light of discussion elsewhere I think we should revisit the
> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_
> scope/Precautionary_principle
>
> The policy states "where there is *significant* doubt about the freedom
> of a particular file, it should be deleted"  yet when it comes to
> nominating a file "it may be" is sufficient to delete an image to "I have a
> reason to believe its not free because....."  there should more onus on the
> nominator at the very least show that there is a reason for doubt
>
>
> We already have this principle with URAA nominated images "Files
> nominated for deletion due to the URAA should be evaluated carefully, as
> should be their copyright status under US and local laws. *A mere *
> *allegation** that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason
> for deletion*. If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is
> significant doubt about the freedom of a file under US or local law, the
> file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle
> <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Project_scope/Precautionary_principle>
> ."
>
> I think a change from the current
>
>    - Also, arguments that amount to "we can get away with it", such as
>    the following, are against Commons' aims:
>
> to
>
>    - A mere allegation that the precautionary principle applies is
>    insufficient, likewise arguments that amount to "we can get away with
>    it", such as the following, are against Commons' aims:
>
> --
> ​Gnangarra
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Commons-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
>
>
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l

Reply via email to