Odd. I am getting blind in my old age. After reading through the build scripts for 2.0.5 and the build.xml files for both 2.0.5 and 2.0.6, I looked in the directory for 2.0.6 and discovered the jar right where the build.xml said it would be. And the file date said it was made yesterday.
And no build directory used in 2.0.6. Okay, so "ant jar" just worked as is. Sorry about the static. > Just want to check on this -- > > The "COMPILE" file in the distribution does not contain any build > scripts or batches. (Does contain a build.xml, and I tried running ant > against that, but I'm not at all confident of my results. Couldn't seem > to get a jar.) > > In fact, the 2.0.6 distribution is less than half the size of the 2.0.5 > distribution. 2.0.7 is also less than half the size of 2.0.5, and does > not contain build scripts/batches. > > The 2.0.5 distribution has the build directory and the scripts/batches, > so I'm thinking to just use those. How likely am I to meet with > disappointment? > > Should I just go with the 2.0.5 distribution for HTTPClient and Latka? -- Joel Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
