This feature was added recently. I believe the new tag now supports arg tags in it's body.
Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/12/2002 07:59:41 AM: > > On Samedi, d�cembre 7, 2002, at 09:38 , Mark R. Diggory wrote: > > > I looked at it. I didn't notice however, can it construct non-bean like > > constructors with arguments? > > I don't think... -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog Work: http://www.multitask.com.au -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
