Since commons-logging is just a wrapper to another logging implementation (ie log4j, logkit, jdk14, etc), it is my belief that if the underlying logger is thread safe, then commons-logging is also thread safe.
IMHO, of course. Scott > -----Original Message----- > From: Jerome Jacobsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 8:53 AM > To: Jakarta-Commons-User > Subject: [Logging] Thread safety guaruntee of Log classes? > > > Struts framework classes make heavy use of Commons Logging. > However they always declare their Log instances as static > member variables. I am currently in the processing of moving > from the Log4J API to Commons Logging. In Log4J the Category > is thread-safe. Is there any guarantee that a Commons Log > instance is thread-safe? I see nothing related to > thread-safety in the API docs. If not, then why is Struts > assuming thread-safety? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:commons-user-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
