Re: [jelly] ParsteTag class to become more abstract ?

[Paul Libbrecht]

Le Mercredi, 29 janv 2003, � 12:25 Europe/Berlin, James Strachan a �crit :

If you're willing to do the work this sounds fine with me. Then we could have a jdom library or a W3C DOM library.

Currently working on that... looks like not everything could be done such a generic ParseTag, in particular, the definition of the variable cannot... because you have no way to extract a kind "document" from a sax ContentHandler... but it's slowly going.

One nice patch would be to provide a generic Navigator for Jaxen so that it'd evaluate XPath expressions on any kind of XML object model.

But doesn't Jaxen have this generic interface already ?
Do you mean we should use Jaxen instead of the bundled dom4j one?

Then it wouldn't matter which xml library was used to create DOM-ish objects, all the XPath related tags (JellyUnit etc) would
just work.

Oh, that would be more involved... I am not sure to get what the difference would be here...

Paul


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]