I'm trying to say that if we can composite Rules we doesn't need the extended base rules.
-----Mensaje original----- De: robert burrell donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: Jueves, 27 de Febrero de 2003 12:57 Para: Jakarta Commons Users List Asunto: Re: Digester w/ Recursive Tags hi Pablo i'm not sure that i really understand what you're driving at here. AFAIK recursive tags can be processed pretty well already using (for example) the extended base rules. could you give a more detailed example of what you're having problems with? - robert On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 02:42 PM, Pablo Nussembaum wrote: > I've the same problem, and I think to solve the problem we need to > change the digesters rules to accept another rule (like a composite > pattern) > > > > An example will make my point more clear. > > > > public void parse() > > { > > ... > > Digeter d = new Digester(); > > Rule r = new xxxxRule("a"); > > r.addXxxxRule("b"); > > > > d.addRule(r); > > > > ... > > } > > -- > Pablo Nussembaum > mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Tel: +54-11-4382-6400 int 123 > Datatransfer S.A. > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
