On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Thomas Nichols wrote:
> Has a commons.logging.Log.setLevel() been ruled out for architectural > reasons? This would have kept my code generic.
Yes, because it is out of scope and inconsistent with the charter of commons-logging.
> > Thanks, > Thomas. >
Craig
No problem - thanks for the work you've put in. Would the suggestion of a non-typesafe accessor method to the underlying Log4J / JDK14 logger object invoke spontaneous vomiting?
Thomas.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
