At 13:41 02/04/2003 -0800, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:


On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Thomas Nichols wrote:

> Has a commons.logging.Log.setLevel() been ruled out for architectural
> reasons? This would have kept my code generic.

Yes, because it is out of scope and inconsistent with the charter of
commons-logging.

>
> Thanks,
> Thomas.
>

Craig

No problem - thanks for the work you've put in. Would the suggestion of a non-typesafe accessor method to the underlying Log4J / JDK14 logger object invoke spontaneous vomiting?


Thomas.


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to