> Any reason why jexl doesn't do type coercion with LT/GT expressions > like it does for others?
I'm not sure, but possibly because it's dangerous, in the sense that type conversion might not do what the programmer intended. For example, would 9 > "10" evaluate to true or false? 9 < 10 but "9" > "10" Just a guess, Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Royal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 4:55 AM Subject: [jexl] type coercion in LT/GT expressions > Any reason why jexl doesn't do type coercion with LT/GT expressions > like it does for others? > -pete > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
