On Dimanche, juil 13, 2003, at 15:33 Europe/Paris, Laird J. Nelson wrote:
I'm not entirely sure of the ground I'm standing on here, but what would
it take to make Jelly a BSF-compliant scripting language? Is that a
meaningful question?
Looks very decent to me.
What's more in a bsf connection than connecting some context and providing bean access ?
The thing is, jelly already does behave in this way (addressing bean-properties by names at least)... so what would be the advantage ?
The startup/packaging ? (this is where, indeed, to me, jelly is a bit painful)
Paul
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
