Cool, I can gather my thoughts on a possible autoselection solution
and maybe post it in the TODO's or we can use the apache wiki.
Probably head over to the -dev list for any further discussion.


>>>>> On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 09:33:20 -0600, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

> Jeffrey, I'm soon to be laid off and will have a little time on my
> hands.  I would like to take a look at cleaning some of this up.  I
> wrote a bug yesterday against the docs which are not totally
> correct.

> Additionally, there has suddenly been a lot of grumbling over at the
> Ant site over the FTP task and the impossibility of getting a
> non-unix parser using ant's <ftp> task so there is good small bundle
> of issues to handle.

> -----Original Message----- From: Jeffrey D. Brekke
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 10:37
> PM To: Jakarta Commons Users List Subject: Re: questions about FTP
> LIST processing (FTPFileListParser)



> The list parsers are ( in my opinion ) on the road to deprecation in
> favor of the entry parsers.  What I would like to do is implement
> the deprecated list parsers with the entry parser implementations so
> we don't have to support both any longer.  As soon as I get time.
> Sorry for the confusion.  I'd start with the entry parsers off the
> bat though.

>>>>> On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:24:57 -0700, Chris Malley 
>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

>> I did a little poking around in the source.  In case someone refers
>> to

>> this thread in the future...

>> UnixFTPEntryParser is based on the DefaultFTPFileListParser
>> implementation, but they are not identical. UnixFTPEntryParser was
>> adapted to use regular expressions and to fit the new
>> FTPFileEntryParser interface, while DefaultFTPFileListParser uses
>> the old FTPFileListParser interface.

>> And thanks again to Steve -- I never would have known to look at
>> the javadoc for UnixFTPEntryParser for info on what
>> DefaultFTPFileListParser does.

>> -Chris


>> Steve Cohen wrote:
>>> Default is UnixFTPEntryParser.  I don't know what's different
>>> about EnterpriseUnixFTPEntryParser, someone contributed that.  The
>>> others are pretty straightforward, NT, OS2, VMS.  No doubt there
>>> are others.

>>> If these don't fit your pattern, consider writing your own and
>>> contributing it.  It's pretty straightforward, you can use the
>>> others

>>> as models, if you understand regular expressions. -----Original
>>> Message----- From: Chris Malley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 2:03 PM To:
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: questions about FTP LIST
>>> processing (FTPFileListParser) I'm writing an FTP client that
>>> makes heavy use of the 'LIST' command, and I'm operating in an
>>> enviroment that has a wide range of FTP server types.  So the
>>> 'LIST' output is apt to vary.  The answers to these questions have
>>> eluded me so far: Which FTP servers does DefaultFTPFileListParser
>>> handle?  How do I decide when to use the various list parsers that
>>> are provided?  (i.e., EnterpriseUnixFTPEntryParser,
>>> NTFTPEntryParser, OS2FTPEntryParser, UnixFTPEntryParser,
>>> VMSFTPEntryParser) Should I look at FTPClient.getSystemName()?...
>>> Thanks, -Chris
>>> 


>> -- Chris Malley Contractor - PixelZoom, Inc.  Email @ EMC:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice @ EMC: (303)293-9331 x1235


>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> --
> =====================================================================
> Jeffrey D. Brekke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wisconsin, USA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]


> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]


> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
=====================================================================
Jeffrey D. Brekke                                   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wisconsin,  USA                                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to