On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 09:32, Chad Woolley wrote: > Hello, > > I never got any bites on this, so here it is again with all the info in > one place. > > I'd really like to resolve this, as it is preventing me from using > Digester. I guess I should try to write a failing unit test for it and > submit it as a bug, but I'm not sure whether it is a problem with > BeanUtils or Digester. It really appears to be the JDK > Method.getParameterTypes() that is behaving incorrectly, but that seems > unlikely, it is probably some issue with another tool or my environment.
If you can provide a simple test case that demonstrates the problem I would be happy to have a look at it (at least as far as the Digester part of the problem goes). However I am a fairly heavy user of Digester, and am not aware of any bugs that may cause this, so I would not have a clue where to start to duplicate the problem myself. I presume the code you included in your previous email is runnable "stand-alone"? If you directly email me the source code files I will give them a spin. Have you tried enabling digester log output and checking that the right objects are being generated on the stack? Digester uses commons-logging, so for example putting a log4j.xml file in the classpath can be used to configure the logging. That will probably be my first step.. > > Both the parent and child objects on the stack when I call > Digester.addSetNext() are plain public java objects, with no > superclasses, and all public methods. That sounds like it all should work. > > > > Here is the XML: > > > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > > <virtualmock xmlns="http://www.virtualmock.org/virtualmock.xsd";> > > <excluded-classes> > > <exclusion-pattern>test.*</exclusion-pattern> > > </excluded-classes> > > <rules> > > <rule> > > > > <rule-type>org.virtualmock.rule.AllRecordedCallsMustBeInvokedRule</rule-type> > > > > </rule> > > </rules> > > </virtualmock> > > > > ------------------------------------- > > > > Here is the Digester: > > > > vmConfig = new VMConfig(); > > > > digester.push(vmConfig); > > digester.setValidating(validate); > > > > > > digester.addCallMethod("virtualmock/excluded-classes/exclusion-pattern", > > "addClassExclusionPattern", 0); > > > > digester.addObjectCreate("virtualmock/rules/rule", > > RuleConfig.class); > > digester.addBeanPropertySetter("virtualmock/rules/rule/rule-type", > > "ruleType"); > > digester.addSetNext("virtualmock/rules/rule", "addRuleConfig", > > "org.virtualmock.configuration.RuleConfig"); > > > > try { > > digester.parse(inputStream); > > } catch (SAXException saxException) { > > > > ------------------------------------- > > > > Here is the Parent object: > > > > public class VMConfig { > > private List classExclusionPatterns = null; > > private List ruleConfigs = null; > > > > public VMConfig() { > > classExclusionPatterns = new ArrayList(); > > ruleConfigs = new ArrayList(); > > } > > > > public List getClassExclusionPatterns() { > > return classExclusionPatterns; > > } > > > > public List getRuleConfigs() { > > return ruleConfigs; > > } > > > > public void addClassExclusionPattern(String classExclusionPattern) { > > classExclusionPatterns.add(classExclusionPattern); > > } > > > > public void addRuleConfig(RuleConfig ruleConfig) { > > ruleConfigs.add(ruleConfig); > > } > > } > > > > ------------------------------------- > > > > Here is the Child object: > > > > public class RuleConfig { > > private String ruleType = null; > > > > public void setRuleType(String ruleType) { > > this.ruleType = ruleType; > > } > > > > public String getRuleType() { > > return ruleType; > > } > > > > public RuleConfig() { > > super(); > > } > > > > } > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
