commons-logging doesn't really configure the logging system (log4j in this case), the commons-logging configuration just chooses the logging system to be used. therefore, i think that the log4j configuration should be transparent (in other words, the same whether you call log4j directly or through commons-logging).
i hope that this answers your question.
- robert
On 14 Apr 2004, at 17:41, Guy Katz wrote:
hi all;
I just recently started working with the common-logging.
I am using JBOSS app server.
it seems I have 2 choices configuring my logging mechanism for my
application:
1. adding my configuration to the log4j.xml already existing in the JBOSS
directory.
2. put a system property with the -Dlog4j... with my file name and than
loose the JBOSS configuration (or add it to my file)
both method dont seem very good to me cause i dont want to merge JBoss
configuration and my configuration.
I am looking to know if there is a 3rd way which is using common-logging and
have 2 different log4j.xml files such that my enterprise application will
use my xml configuration and JBoss will use his.
can I achieve this?
i think with log4j i could have used the DOMConfigurator to load my
configuration as well. did i loose this ability using commons-logging?
thanks for the help.
____________________ Guy Katz Allot Communications [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel: +972 9 7619288 fax: +972 9 7443626
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
