Hi again Dion,

Actually I'm a bit confused about by this.

In the course of writing the test program for the size problem I wrote tests for the string concatenation as well and they worked. In my tests for the my library using JEXL it doesn't. I am wrapping the JexlContext to hide the dependency on JEXL (in case I make the expression language puggable later). Using my wrapping class in a simple test program it still works!!!

I'll investigate further and try the latest version of JEXL from CVS.

The exception I get in the tests for my product looks like this:
Caused by: java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "Testing"
at java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.java:48)
at java.lang.FloatingDecimal.readJavaFormatString(FloatingDecimal.java:1213)
at java.lang.Double.valueOf(Double.java:184)
at java.lang.Double.<init>(Double.java:259)
at org.apache.commons.jexl.util.Coercion.coerceDouble(Coercion.java:122)
at org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.ASTAddNode.value(ASTAddNode.java:83)
at org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.ASTExpression.value(ASTExpression.java:47)
at org.apache.commons.jexl.ExpressionImpl.evaluate(ExpressionImpl.java:83)


Anyway thanks again for your quick action on this.

Geoff

Dion Gillard wrote:

On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 10:52:28 +0900, Geoff Waggott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Hi,

I'm using JEXL in a XMLC-like XML transformation library I'm writing.
Overall it seems very stable. There are a couple issues I've come across:
- The overloaded + string concatenation operator only seems to work for
string literals.



The above bug was fixed and a test case added to ensure it stays fixed :-)





--
===========================================================
Geoff Waggott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ZergSoft
Tel:   (052) 930-7790
FAX:   (052) 930-7791
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.zergsoft.com
===========================================================


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to