I am jumping into this a little late but I would just like to offer that if there are features someone needs from [clazz], perhaps we should consider them for [lang]?
Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 13:26 > To: Jakarta Commons Users List > Subject: Re: [Clazz] Is anybody maintaining this? > > Indeed, hosting at sourceforge may be the best option for someone willing > to > take this forward. One of the key reasons I have not taken it forward is > that it is no longer an itch I need to scratch. > > (I was a liitle tired and stressed in my first reply IIRC, sorry ;-) > > Stephen > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Simon Kitching" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 15:14, Dmitri Plotnikov wrote: > > > I am not convinced rehosting Clazz would all of a suddent breath life > into > > > it. I was the one Stephen refers to as "another", who wrote all that > code. > > > I stopped working on it some time ago because everybody, including > Stephen > > > himself apparently abandoned it. Perhaps I was taking it in the wrong > > > direction - don't know. I would be happy to pick up where we dropped > it > off > > > in Jakarta commons sandbox. The only trouble has been very little to > no > > > interest in it. > > > > > > > It *might* not. But from my understanding of the Apache license, it > > would be entirely legal to do so, as long as the terms of the license > > are followed. > > > > If none of the commons members are interested in working on the code, > > and someone else is but is not a commons member, then there are two > > options: > > (a) try to get nominated as a commons committer (not so easy), or > > (b) try to get a commons committer to perform codereviews+commits on > > your behalf (could be hard to find someone if there truly is little > > interest in the code from current commons members), or > > (c) take the existing code and start a sourceforge project with it. > > > > I don't personally think option (c) is bad; the code exists and if > > no-one at jakarta-commons has the energy/time/interest to push it > > forward then it may as well be put to good use by someone who does. > > > > And if the project gathers momentum on sourceforge, then I think that > > commons would be open to a later "re-merger" (probably involving making > > the maintainers commons members). > > > > Of course all this is just my personal opinion. > > > > Regards, > > > > Simon > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
